The 2019 presidential race is over two years away, yet legislators are as of now occupied with “mosquito politicking”, a coinage made well known by the late General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua. In any case, previous President Olusegun Obasanjo seems to have spilled the beans when he demonstrated in a media report that he would, similar to he had done before, to take part in who develops Nigeria’s leader in 2019. Be that as it may, Ambassador Ibrahim Maisule negotiator and lawmaker amid Obasanjo’s residency says the country has had enough of the previous military and regular citizen ruler foisting ill-equipped and insufficient authority on the nation.
He likewise talked on the fair excursion in this way, the battle against defilement and inward gathering vote based system, among different issues. Nigerians had hopefully trusted that with the arrival of vote based system in 1999, the country and its people groups will be the better for it. What is your evaluation of our vote based system? Nigeria’s majority rules system is debilitated. This endless sick wellbeing wrecking our majority rules system springs from the very slip-up of the leaving military powers and their political partners who planted President Olusegun Obasanjo, straight from jail, in the Presidential estate where he brought on more mischief than useful for a long time. Our vote based system was undermined by two hazardous elements: Corruption and absence of political gathering discipline and inward vote based system. They likewise imperiled the freedom of the assembly in our vote based system. Nigerians had elevated requirements on the approach of our vote based system and considerably more prominent trusts that it would offer great life and advance culture of good administration in Nigeria. Amb Maisule But President Obasanjo on the third of June 1999 adulterated the way toward choosing the authority of the National Assembly.
Cash from the Obasanjo Presidency was utilized to create the late Senator Evan Enwerem as Senate President against the favored and well known application of Dr Chuba Okadigbo. It was a risky point of reference. This particular occasion did the best damage to our popular government. It acquainted defilement with our equitable nation and undermined political gathering discipline since President Obasanjo utilized his Alliance for Democracy (AD) family and representatives from All Peoples Party (APP) to do “upset” in the red chamber. Obasanjo did same damage in the House of Representatives where an unfit individual was chosen Speaker Salisu Buhari. These were miserable improvements that showed sufficiently early that Nigeria’s majority rules system was imperiled. All through President Obasanjo’s years, the National Assembly never chose their own pioneers aside from they were endorsed by the Presidency. Resistance gatherings were defiled and left in confuse, while the decision political gathering delivered new administration consistently. The PDP, the decision party then, had Chief Solomon Lar, Barnabas Gemade, Audu Ogbeh and Ahmadu Ali as directors of PDP inside eight years. It was horrible! Obasanjo made a wilderness out of Nigeria’s majority rule government.
That is the thing that we are enduring today! Yet, Obasanjo claims he battled debasement? It is begging to be proven wrong in the event that he did with the earnestness it merited. The accompanying check list puts a question mark on the counter debasement arrangement of the Obasanjo organization: Was it a war against defilement or war against political adversaries? Notwithstanding his freely announced arrangement to battle debasement, previous President Obasanjo mishandled open trust by utilizing the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offenses Commission (ICPC) to manage saw political foes. The political obstruction got so awful that the House of Representatives undermined to revise the EFCC Act to expel the organizations from the control of the President. Indeed, the Uwais Committee on Electoral Reforms, set up by the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, had prescribed that the ability to choose the EFCC Chairman ought to be practiced by the Chief Justice of the Federation. Obasanjo didn’t stop there. He made the alleged EFCC arraignment list, which contained names of government officials he needed precluded from challenging the 2007 surveys. Free National Electoral Commission utilized the arraignment rundown to preclude previous Vice President Atiku Abubakar from challenging the decision. The courts however told Iwu that INEC had no energy to exclude competitors and that lone the courts had such power. Obasanjo likewise utilized EFCC to reprimand governors who dropped out of support with him. Subside Odili would have been the PDP competitor in 2007, yet Obasanjo utilized the EFCC to preclude him.
Obasanjo additionally sent EFCC after a bank in Lagos and Abuja looking for the supposed billions Atiku purportedly stole. Toward the end of the attacks, the EFCC didn’t tell Nigerians the amount of Atiku’s claimed stolen billions they recuperated. Obasanjo’s third term venture was additionally financed through affirmed defilement. A few officials were professedly paid off to vote for his aspiration to proceed in office by altering the Constitution to evacuate term limits. The offer was vanquished on May 16, 2006, in spite of the charged fixes. A previous legislative leader of Jigawa State asserted that he offered N10billion to the Obasanjo third term extend out of the N30billion he was charged to have occupied from the state. Obasanjo utilized asserted defilement to evacuate central officers of the National Assembly, for example, Dr. Chuba Okadigbo however neglected to expel Alhaji Ghali Umar Na’Abba from office. Truth be told, the acclaimed Ghana-must-go adventure in the House of Representatives can’t be overlooked in a rush. Those were packs of cash supposedly offered by Obasanjo’s intermediaries to the individuals from the House to have their authority expelled. Regardless of his falsification to battling debasement, Obasanjo, in 2002, unceremoniously expelled a previous acting Auditor General of the Federation, Mr. Vincent Azi, due to his ominous give an account of the Obasanjo Presidency.
The withdrawal of defilement accusations against a previous government changeless secretary in the Ministry of Defense, Mr. Julius Makanjuola, through a nolle prosequi despite open clamor, was a piece of the pietism of the Obasanjo against debasement war. All in all, Obasanjo against debasement exertion was planned to trick Nigerians and the worldwide group. He began battling Atiku on the grounds that he didn’t bolster his third term desire. It gives the idea that despite the fact that the following decision is over two years away, Obasanjo has given sign that he is arranged to taking part in deciding Nigeria’s next president. That won’t be the first run through, however is the nation better for it? To begin with, it is unlawful and a crime of majority rules system, if, for any reason, one man, in a nation of 180 million individuals, is permitted to introduce the nation’s pioneers. Be that as it may, this has happened two or three circumstances in our late history as a majority rule nation as Obasanjo, as a previous military Head of State and previous non military personnel President, has played a more than easygoing part in the rise of previous Presidents. The outcome, be that as it may, is that the nation is more terrible for it, on the grounds that Obasanjo, in practicing this impact, has not been guided by the best enthusiasm of the nation. Obasanjo was instrumental to the development of previous President Goodluck Jonathan as Yar’Adua’s successor. It was Obasanjo that guaranteed that Jonathan was shot to the lifted up position of the Vice President. Before then, Jonathan was delegate legislative head of Bayelsa State.
Obasanjo guaranteed the height of the unpracticed Jonathan as a political support done to the general population of the South-South from where the nation inferred immense lump of its national income. In any case, you would expect that if selecting Jonathan was for the advantage of the Niger Delta individuals, it would have been proper if the conclusion pioneers of the zone were counseled and permitted to make an info. Or maybe, in his standard all-knowing way, Obasanjo acted singularly and foisted a hesitant pioneer on a major and complex nation like Nigeria. The rest like we as a whole know is history. The effect of Jonathan five years administration on the economy of Nigeria and the asserted plundering of national income and debasement under his supervision, passing by the introduction by the Muhammadu Buhari government, demonstrates that, as Nigeria’s pioneer, Jonathan was a calamity, for which Obasanjo ought to be faulted.
It is imperative that the Nigerian individuals attempt to take their political predetermination in their own particular hands and reject the nosiness of Obasanjo as the country anticipates the 2019 general races. What did we get from each one of those Obasanjo decided for us? His nosy in our national legislative issues has brought us to where we’ve gotten ourselves. Every single Nigerian president since Obasanjo’s leave 10 years back have had his imprimatur. What’s more, what have we gotten from the greater part of that with the exception of agony, hardship, stagflation, retreat, yearning and starvation? In this manner, he ought not be permitted or urged to choose future pioneers for the nation, in the event that we, as a people, are to escape from the repeating cycle of disappointment and disappointment which has been the part of our political experience.